Threat Intelligence jobs and hiring demand

Core and required roles are separated from contextual and optional mentions so the headline does not overstate job intent.

Explore Threat Intelligence by location

Select up to five markets; results and hiring evidence update together.

41core + required roles106context + optional mentions39remote-friendly▼ -14 this week

Employer concentration

Google accounts for 18 of 147 mentions (12%). The remaining 129 mentions span other employers.

Threat Intelligence market intelligence visualization

Engineering demand with role context

Threat Intelligence market guide

Threat Intelligence demand is best read through vacancy evidence, role context, and the technologies used alongside it. ApplyDjinn separates core and required usage from supporting mentions so candidates can distinguish hands-on ownership from general stack exposure. Current hiring evidence includes Google, Wiz, Anthropic. Leading observed locations include United States, Remote, California, United States.

147 live roles46 hiring companies27% remote-friendly

Vacancy evidence map

Where Threat Intelligence carries hiring weight

Each segment represents roles where Threat Intelligence was parsed at that evidence tier. This keeps a required production skill separate from contextual stack language.

15 Core26 Required75 Supporting31 Optional
41core + required28% of mentions
3.2roles per company46 employers

Market interpretation

What Threat Intelligence demand means in practice

Threat Intelligence can represent different work depending on the role family and delivery environment. The live evidence map on this page shows whether employers treat it as a primary capability, a required implementation skill, supporting context, or an optional advantage. Companion demand such as AI, Cloud, Python, Cybersecurity helps explain the actual systems and responsibilities behind the keyword.

A credible Threat Intelligence application should connect the skill to a concrete system, decision, and result. State what you built, configured, migrated, secured, tested, or operated; name the scale and constraints; and explain the outcome. This gives hiring teams stronger evidence than a standalone skill badge or an undifferentiated list of tools.

Product engineeringBackend and systemsPlatform integrationQuality and operations

Reading the market

Signals to look for

  • Read Threat Intelligence together with AI, Cloud, Python, Cybersecurity; combinations reveal the likely workload and ownership boundary.
  • Core and required mentions deserve more weight than incidental text in a company or product description.
  • Role title, seniority, location, and adjacent skills determine whether prior experience transfers directly or needs a focused ramp-up.

Questions candidates ask

Threat Intelligence hiring FAQ

What does Threat Intelligence demand mean on this page?

It counts fresh vacancies where Threat Intelligence was found in title, requirements, responsibilities, or stack evidence. The tier breakdown separates central requirements from supporting and optional mentions.

How should Threat Intelligence appear on a CV?

Tie it to a specific project or production responsibility, the surrounding stack, the constraint you handled, and an outcome. Match the depth of the claim to the evidence shown in the target vacancy.

How Threat Intelligence appears in job requirements

Inferred from the title and requirement wording in 147 active roles; each role is counted once. Read the methodology.

Posting evidence, not a company-wide stack claim
Main / core
10%(15)
Required
18%(26)
Supporting / context
51%(75)
Nice-to-have
21%(31)

Skills mentioned with Threat Intelligence

A shared posting does not always require both skills. Explicit alternatives are counted separately.

Role graph

Roles hiring for Threat Intelligence